Beyond Inclusion?

Nepal is at a pivotal moment, with a new government taking the helm. While there is a sense of optimism, a critical concept looms large: inclusion. This principle appears to be a significant challenge, particularly within the ranks of the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP), where the leadership is predominantly male. The party’s selection of female candidates for the recent election was notably low, with only 16 women fielded, of whom 13 secured their seats. The composition of the upcoming Cabinet further suggests a potential deficit in female representation.

Proportional Representation and Unfulfilled Promises

The RSP has allocated 48 of its 57 Proportional Representation (PR) seats to women. However, a closer examination reveals a concerning imbalance: 24 of these appointees are from the Khas Arya or Newa communities, leaving only half of the reserved seats for other marginalized and indigenous groups. This approach raises questions about the genuine commitment to diversity and representation, especially considering the broader parliamentary landscape.

This election saw 96 women elected as Members of Parliament (MPs), constituting 35 percent of the total, a historic high for Nepal. Yet, as critics both within and outside the RSP have pointed out, the party seems to have favored certain women for PR slots who may not possess the requisite qualifications or depth of contribution to civil society that such leadership positions should ideally demand. These roles, it is argued, should be earned through significant dedication and impact.

The Paradox of Social Media and Superficial Selection

Ironically, while younger generations often express disdain for superficiality on social media, the RSP appears to have fallen into a similar trap in its selection process. Reports suggest that some individuals were chosen based on their appearance rather than their substantive contributions or qualifications. This practice is likely to be deeply disheartening for those who have dedicated decades to public service and societal betterment without seeking personal gain.

Furthermore, the manner in which some of these newly appointed members have ascended the PR list is particularly troubling. There are accounts of individuals bypassing more experienced female party members, who have garnered more votes and possess longer tenures, through what appears to be an unscrupulous ethic. This behavior, prioritizing personal ambition over collective good and established merit, does not bode well for the future of public service.

The Misappropriation of Affirmative Action

The PR list was originally conceived as a quota system and an affirmative action mechanism within Nepal’s constitution. Its purpose was to provide a voice and representation for historically marginalized communities who have been systematically excluded. Drawing a stark parallel, placing individuals with existing privilege onto these reserved lists is akin to a well-off, educated, and empowered individual occupying a spot intended for a disempowered member of a marginalized group. This happens when the rules are bent, or when those in power turn a blind eye to blatant favoritism. Such unprincipled actions undermine the very goal of achieving future parity for those who have long been sidelined by established power structures.

There is no justifiable reason for individuals who already possess significant social capital, financial means, and the ability to contest elections independently to occupy seats reserved for the underrepresented. This is a regrettable pattern that has been observed with older political parties, and its perpetuation by a new movement like the RSP is particularly distressing. The unapologetic use of privilege, wealth, and connections to supersede more deserving and experienced women is a stark observation, especially coming in the wake of Women’s Day and the end of Women’s Month.

Redefining Inclusion and Prioritizing True Needs

Genuine inclusion requires a commitment to real change. It necessitates diligent effort in identifying individuals who truly need a platform and the space to cultivate their voices. It means stepping aside to allow hardworking individuals, who genuinely require such opportunities, to come forward.

Many privileged and educated individuals remain unaware of the realities of inequality that exist beyond their sheltered environments. Their understanding of the complex legal and linguistic intricacies of Nepal, which are essential for any aspiring MP, is often limited.

There are those with ample education and a sense of entitlement who might prefer hosting lavish events over contributing to charitable causes like scholarship funds. Conversely, there are compassionate, low-income, blue-collar workers who consistently offer what little they can when appeals for help are broadcasted through radio or social media. It is a reasonable assumption that the latter group might be better equipped to make decisions that serve the greater good.

Leadership and Shifting Priorities

Balendra Shah, a figure whose true character remains somewhat enigmatic, is undoubtedly someone to watch. He demonstrated considerable courage and audacity by challenging KP Oli on his home turf and emerging victorious. However, sheer boldness does not always translate into effective leadership.

In the Kathmandu Valley, critical issues such as air pollution, public transportation, waste segregation and management, and access to clean water fall under the purview of the mayor’s office. These are, and remain, far more pressing concerns than the forceful removal of struggling street vendors. For Shah to transition into a national leadership role, his priorities must undergo a significant reordering. He cannot allow personal preferences and dislikes to dictate his actions and agenda.

Economic Realities and the Future of Work

In the contemporary global landscape, the pervasive influence of money and power often marginalizes the most disenfranchised and neglected segments of society. A fundamental shift away from conventional capitalism towards a circular economy, fostering sustainable and fulfilling employment, is urgently needed.

Creating meaningful, long-term employment opportunities and implementing effective training programs for a population where 49 percent are under the age of 25 presents a monumental challenge. The question arises: will Nepal continue to exclusively emphasize and reward achievements in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields? Or will there finally be a recognized space for artists and artisans of all disciplines to have their voices heard and their skills valued, rather than exclusively elevating doctors, engineers, and economists to positions of leadership?

Climate Change and Unrealistic Promises

A significant oversight by most political parties, including the RSP, has been the inadequate prioritization of climate change. This is particularly concerning for Nepal, often referred to as the ‘Third Pole,’ given the dire threat of its rapidly melting glaciers. Without a serious and immediate climate action plan, Nepal’s vast agricultural potential, which could offer significant geopolitical leverage through food security, will remain unrealized as its rivers dwindle. The celebrated hydropower potential will also be jeopardized. The widening gap between the rich and the poor will be exacerbated by the devastating impacts of climate change.

Many parties, including the RSP, have put forth election manifestos containing promises that appear frankly unattainable with their current strategies. Achieving a seven percent annual GDP growth, for instance, necessitates the establishment of dynamic and successful industries, a process that takes considerable time and investment. If these ambitious plans are indeed the intended course, they require strategic, honest revision, with the well-being of all stakeholders in the country – young, old, across genders and ethnicities – at the forefront.

Character is Action: The Ultimate Test

In the realm of filmmaking, screenwriting adheres to a few fundamental tenets, one of which posits that “character is action.” This means that, whether on screen or in real life, one’s actions are the truest reflection of who they are. Over time, a pattern of repeated actions solidifies into one’s character.

As the coming year unfolds and the new RSP leaders assume their roles, propelled by the wave of support for Shah, their actions will be under constant scrutiny. Their deeds will define their true identities, rather than any pronouncements or pretense. Their genuine commitment to the welfare of their fellow Nepali citizens will ultimately determine their trajectory – whether they rise to prominence or face downfall. They must, and will, be held accountable for their actions.